Elon Musk has never been shy about moonshot goals. When it comes to electric vehicles (EVs), achieving ever-greater range, faster charging times, and lower costs are paramount. Enter the Tesla 4680 battery cell, unveiled by Musk himself at Tesla Battery Day in September 2020. Promised to be a revolutionary leap forward, the 4680’s fate seems to be hanging in the balance, with Elon Musk himself issuing an ultimatum.
The 4680, named for its 46mm diameter and 80mm height, boasts a larger form factor compared to Tesla’s previously used 2170 cells. This, according to Elon Musk, would unlock a potential 50% increase in range and a 60% reduction in production costs. The bigger size also allows for faster charging due to reduced current density. Classic Elon Musk, these were ambitious promises.
However, the path from prototype to production has been rockier than anticipated. While Tesla has managed to ramp up 4680 production, it’s only for the high-volume Cybertruck, and even there, limitations exist. The cost reductions haven’t materialized yet, and according to some reports, the 4680 cells might be facing technical hurdles that could lead to them collapsing during use. This has seemingly put Elon Musk in a critical mood.
In May 2024, Musk reportedly laid down the gauntlet to his 4680 team. He demanded a significant cost reduction and a solution to the potential collapsing issue by year’s end. With this ticking clock, all eyes are on Elon Musk and his engineers. Can they iron out the wrinkles and deliver on the 4680’s potential, or will it become another unfulfilled promise?
The implications are significant. If the 4680 lives up to its billing, it could be a game-changer for Tesla and the entire EV industry. It would allow Tesla to produce longer-range, faster-charging EVs at a more competitive price point. This, in turn, could accelerate EV adoption worldwide, a goal that Elon Musk has long championed.
However, if the 4680 fails to deliver, it could be a setback for Tesla and raise questions about Elon Musk’s ambitious pronouncements. With so much riding on the 4680, the pressure is on for Elon Musk and his team to deliver. Only time will tell if the 4680 lives up to the hype or becomes another footnote in Elon Musk’s ever-evolving vision for the future of transportation.
Suhas is the founder and chief editor of vecharged.com, a leading US-based publication focused on the future of energy and mobility. With a deep passion for the technology that is shaping our world, his work focuses on providing clear-eyed analysis and rigorous, hands-on reviews of the latest electric vehicles, home solar systems, and portable power solutions. He founded vecharged to cut through the industry jargon and provide consumers with the data-driven, unbiased information necessary to navigate the clean energy transition with confidence. His insights have helped thousands of readers make smarter, more informed decisions about their energy use.
The Bottom Line: The Sondors Metacycle is a cautionary tale. It is a stunning piece of industrial design that promised to revolutionize the electric motorcycle market, but was ultimately crippled by production compromises, broken promises, and a final product that failed to live up to its own revolutionary hype. For the few who received one,
The Bottom Line: A solar panel is an essential, transformative upgrade for any battery-powered Ring device. For guaranteed compatibility and the best weather sealing, Ring’s official 4W Solar Panels are the benchmark. However, for users seeking more placement flexibility and value, leading third-party options from brands like Wasserstein offer more power and longer cables for
Executive Summary: The State of Charger Anxiety in America 1.1 The New Frontier of EV Ownership For the past decade, the primary psychological barrier to mass electric vehicle (EV) adoption has been “range anxiety”—the driver’s fear that their battery will run out before reaching their destination or a charging station. Advances in battery technology have
The Bottom Line: After a 5-year analysis of all costs—including depreciation, incentives, fuel, insurance, and maintenance—the average American driver will save approximately $6,000 to $10,000 by choosing a mid-range EV over a comparable gasoline-powered SUV. While the initial purchase price is higher, the significantly lower fuel and maintenance costs create substantial long-term savings. Why This
